In neither Trump's or Lewis' words about each other can any objective observer point out any racist overtones whatsoever - because there simply aren't any. An objective observer can only honestly see political opinion from both gentlemen.
But that truth didn't prevent Operation Mockingbird veteran The Washington Post from publishing another fake news piece today, Sunday, January 15, 2017, which is fabricated totally upon the racist, subjective views of its two "reporters", Janell Ross and Vanessa Williams.
As you can read yourself, "Trump’s feud with John Lewis echoes a long, difficult relationship with African Americans" intentionally takes readers from the objective facts of the event's actual subject (Lewis' and Trump's political opinions about each other) and fabricates a wholly subjective, racist plot in order to totally transform the actual subject into the writers' and The Post's preferred narrative, which is the specific purpose of propaganda and fake news.
How many blacks voted for the President-elect? Why weren't any black Trump supporters' viewpoints included in this racist piece aimed squarely at the President-elect? Since they took the totally irresponsible role of writing for "African Americans" (as if that is even possible), why did Ross and Williams only cite subjective voices who just happen to agree with their racist own as the fodder for their complete fabrication?
Where's the honesty? Where's the integrity? Where's the wholesale reporting of facts instead of the transparent propaganda pimping of racist personal opinion?
Oh, that's right: it's The fake news Washington Post.
Disclaimer: I didn't vote in the past general election for two basic reasons:
1. I cannot honestly consider my opinions about any candidate truly objective, in the least, if I'm subjectively invested enough to actually vote for them, and
2. I wouldn't vote for either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton for President of the United States of America for any reason.